Ben Jiang1, Min Wang1, Rahul Baghla2 and Eshani Galermo2
1Amgen, USA; 2SCIEX, USA
:true:
Ben Jiang1, Min Wang1, Rahul Baghla2 and Eshani Galermo2
1Amgen, USA; 2SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates a software-assisted drug metabolite identification and characterization workflow using the ZenoTOF 7600 system and Molecule Profiler software. This approach enables users to achieve increased confidence in metabolite structure assignments by utilizing information-rich electron activated dissociation (EAD) spectra generated using the ZenoTOF 7600 system (Figure 1).
In drug discovery, understanding a compound is crucial for selecting potential drug candidates with good pharmacokinetic properties and optimizing their metabolic pathways. Liquid chromatography combined with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is now a key tool for studying drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK). This technique helps researchers detect changes, identify functional groups and determine the chemical structure of drug metabolites.1
Figure 1: Enhanced structural information and assignment. Zeno CID MS/MS spectra alone were insufficient to distinguish between the hydroxy metabolites of diclofenac. In contrast, the Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra provided compelling evidence with 2 unique fragments at m/z 151.0630 and m/z 176.9744, pinpointing the oxidation on the left side of the molecular structure, which narrowed the identification towards the 4-hydroxy diclofenac metabolite.
During the early phases of drug discovery, in vitro assays are used to estimate metabolic clearance rates and locate metabolic soft spots. LC-MS instruments are extensively employed for these studies due to their ability to deliver quantitative and qualitative data with high sensitivity, particularly for unknown metabolites. Typically, drug metabolite analysis is conducted using CID. However, CID often fails to capture data from labile modifications, which can be crucial. The ZenoTOF 7600 system introduces an alternative fragmentation known as EAD, which offers complementary structural insights to CID and preserves labile modifications that would otherwise be lost as neutral fragments in CID experiments.2-3 EAD fragmentation also allows for a wide degree of adjustments for a broad range of chemical structures and charge states.
Molecule Profiler software was used to identify biotransformations in therapeutic compounds after in vitro incubation, demonstrating a streamlined workflow. The structure assignments for biotransformation are prioritized and scored based on EAD and CID MS/MS data in the Molecule Profiler software. The single result file feature for EAD and CID in Molecule Profiler software makes it ideal for comparing MS/MS spectra and identifying unique fragments.
Sample preparation: Diclofenac at a starting concentration of 10uM was incubated with human liver microsomes (1 mg/mL) in the presence of GSH (1mM), NADPH (1mM) and UDPGA (1mM) at 37°C. Samples were collected at different intervals (0 min, 15 min and 60 min). Protein crash was performed on the total incubation volume (0.5 mL) using 1.5 mL of acetonitrile. Samples were centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 10 minutes and 1.5 mL of the supernatant was dried and reconstituted with 0.3 mL of 1:1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water solution. A 2 µL aliquot of the reconstituted solution was analyzed using LC-MS.
Chromatography: Analytical separation was performed on the ExionLC AD system using a Phenomenex Kinetex-C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 2.6 μm) column at a 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Mobile phase A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. The column temperature was set to 40°C. The gradient conditions used are summarized in Table 1. 2uL sample was used for analysis.
Table 1: LC gradient.
Mass spectrometry: The samples were analyzed using the data-dependent acquisition (DDA) method with Zeno CID DDA and Zeno EAD DDA on the ZenoTOF 7600 system (2 separate experiments). Table 2 summarizes the source and gas conditions, and Table 3 summarizes the Zeno DDA method conditions.
Table 2: Source, gas and ZenoTOF 7600 system conditions.
Table 3: Source, gas and ZenoTOF 7600 system conditions.
Data processing: SCIEX OS software, version 3.4, was used for data acquisition. Molecule Profiler software, version 1.3, was used to identify biotransformation sites using Zeno CID DDA and Zeno EAD DDA data.
Zeno CID and Zeno EAD data were collected on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. The Molecule Profiler software, integrated into SCIEX OS software, was used to process and analyze both data sets in a single result file. Figure 2 shows the overview of the results panel, where users can view the list of potential metabolites and an overview of assigned structures and scoring information. TOF MS or MS/MS and XICs can be evaluated using Molecule Profiler software. The software also displays the mass defect and isotope pattern of the metabolites.1,2
The software uses an automated process to assign structures based on the weighting of Zeno EAD and Zeno CID MS/MS spectra on a scale of 0-100%. Additionally, the software allows users to assign structures in the interpretation pane and generate a total score for the assigned structures.
Figure 3 displays a mirror overlay of the Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra and Zeno CID MS/MS spectra generated from the hydroxy diclofenac metabolite. The EAD MS/MS spectra highlight 2 unique fragments at m/z 151.0630 and m/z 176.9744, which are absent in the CID MS/MS spectra. Figure 4 shows a mirror overlay of the hydroxy diclofenac metabolite Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra and the diclofenac Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra. Here, a common fragment at m/z 151.0594 was observed. Additionally, the diclofenac Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra contained a fragment at m/z 160.9790, while the hydroxy diclofenac Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra featured a fragment at m/z 176.9477, suggesting the hydroxyl group is located on the left side of the structure. As a result, this narrowed the identification towards the 4-hydroxy diclofenac metabolite.
Figure 5 illustrates the characterization of diclofenac acyl glucuronide through an overlay of the Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra and Zeno CID MS/MS spectra. The Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra revealed 2 unique fragments at m/z 208.0729 and m/z 179.0710 specific to diclofenac acyl glucuronide along with 2 additional fragments m/z 437.0858, m/z 327.0934 retaining the glucuronide structure. The listed fragments were not present in the Zeno CID MS/MS spectra of diclofenac acyl glucuronide, highlighting the advantage of EAD over CID for accurately localizing glucuronide conjugation and ruling out the possibility of N-glucuronide formation.
Figure 2: Results panel in the Molecule Profiler software. The panel shows potential metabolites with modifications identified by Molecule Profiler software (A), details with a drop-down menu that includes scoring and structure (B), options to view chromatograms including TIC and XIC (C), TOF MS (D) and MS/MS data (E).
Figure 3: Mirror overlay of the Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra and Zeno CID MS/MS spectra from the hydroxy diclofenac metabolite. The EAD MS/MS spectra highlight 2 unique fragments at m/z 151.0630 and m/z 176.9744, which were not found in the CID MS/MS spectra.
Figure 4: Mirror overlay of the hydroxy diclofenac metabolite Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra and diclofenac Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra. MS/MS spectra overlay reveals a common fragment at m/z 151.0594. Diclofenac shows a fragment at m/z 160.9790, while the hydroxy diclofenac metabolite features one at m/z 176.9477, indicating the hydroxyl group is on the left side.
Figure 5: Automated structure assignment of diclofenac acyl glucuronide metabolite. The Zeno EAD MS/MS spectra of diclofenac acyl glucuronide showing 2 unique fragments at m/z 208.0729 and m/z 179.0710 specific to the diclofenac acyl glucuronide metabolite along with 2 additional fragments m/z 437.0858 and m/z 327.0934 retaining glucuronide structures.