Finding, identifying and confirming peptide catabolites using the ZenoTOF 7600 system
Rahul Baghla, Eshani Nandita and Zoe Zhang
SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates the rapid characterization and identification of therapeutic peptide catabolites from rat liver s9 fractions using the ZenoTOF 7600 system. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) using the Zeno trap generated fragment ions for the confident and sensitive identification of peptide catabolites (Figure 1). Catabolite identification, substrate disappearance and metabolite formation were monitored at different time points using Molecule Profiler software. A streamlined workflow was developed to efficiently characterize and identify therapeutic peptide catabolites using a 10-minute run.
There has been a significant increase in peptide therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently. 1 Peptide therapeutics have many advantages over small molecule drugs, including higher affinity and lower toxicity. Since peptide-like drugs are generally biotransformed into smaller peptides and amino acids, catabolite identification assays are crucial during drug development. Such assays are important to confidently identify structures containing modified amino acids and metabolic soft spots that facilitate their modification to more stable sequences. In vitro models can provide valuable insight into peptide drug catabolism. Efficient identification and verification of catabolites are crucial at multiple drug discovery and development stages. 1 Therapeutic peptide catabolism studies present various challenges, including the possibility of unspecific hydrolysis with multiple charge states for both substrate and potential catabolites. Given a large panel of potential catabolites, more difficulties with identification are presented than with small molecule metabolites. 1 A streamlined workflow for peptide catabolite characterization and identification is demonstrated here using the ZenoTOF 7600 system and Molecule Profiler software.
Sample preparation: Leuprolide was incubated at 37°C in rat liver s9 fractions at a starting concentration of 10µM. Incubations were performed with NADPH. Samples were removed from incubation and quenched with acetonitrile at 0-, 30-, 60-, 90-, 150- and 270-minute intervals. Each sample was centrifuged at 9400 rcf for 10 min at room temperature and was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with water for analysis.
Chromatography: LC separation was performed on an ExionLC system with a Phenomenex Kinetex Polar C18 column (2.1 x 100 mm, 2.6 µm, 100 Å) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The operating column temperature was 40°C. Mobile phase A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. An injection volume of 2 µL was used for analysis.
The chromatographic gradient conditions used are summarized in Table 1.
Mass spectrometry: The samples were analyzed using datadependent acquisition (DDA) with Zeno CID on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. The method conditions used are summarized in Table 2. The source and gas conditions used are summarized in Table 3.
Data processing: SCIEX OS software, version 3.0 was used for data acquisition. Molecule Profiler software was used to predict catabolism sites using Zeno CID DDA data.
The Zeno trap in the ZenoTOF 7600 system significantly boosts the sensitivity of MS/MS fragments. Therefore, Zeno DDA data enables good MS/MS coverage for TOF MS peaks of interest in CID acquisitions. For data processing, Molecule Profiler software automatically predicts the catabolites based on MS1 data and performs catabolite identification using the peptide precursor and catabolite-specific fragment ions.
Leuprolide (pyrHWSYLLRP-[C2H6N]) was used as an experimental model to demonstrate catabolite identification using Molecule Profiler software. Catabolite and fragment identification were performed with <10 ppm mass error. Fragment ions with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) ≥5 were selected for peptide sequence assignment to minimize false positives.
Zeno CID DDA generated abundant diagnostic fragments to identify sites of catabolism from leuprolide incubations. Molecule Profiler software predicted potential catabolites from the parent peptide sequence entered. With software features including candidate ranking and a/y/b ion labeling, Molecule Profiler software facilitates automatic catabolite confirmation and identification.
The 270-minute incubation sample used in this technical note yielded 13 catabolites, including hydrolytic catabolites (Figure 2). The raw data was presented in extracted ion chromatograms (XICs), MS and MS/MS spectra.2
The software identified PyrHWSYLLR (hydrolysis at R8) as a positive catabolite. The interpretation pane for pyrHWSYLLR in Figure 3 shows the MS/MS spectra for the catabolite and the fragment pane with proposed formulas. In addition to MS/MS matching, Molecule Profiler software uses the overall intensity of the fragments and the peak area assignments to confidently determine the catabolites. Complete sequence coverage for 8 amino acids was achieved with only 1 sequence candidate for the selected catabolite. Here, 86.5% of the fragments from pyrHWSYLLR were assigned based on the MS/MS spectrum peak area using a S/N ≥5. Another hydrolysis catabolite, YLLRP-[C2H6N], underwent hydrolysis at R4 and P5, had a retention time of 3.39 minutes and a charge state of +1. YLLRP-[C2H6N] also showed complete sequence coverage for 5 amino acids with 87.5% of fragments assigned based on MS/MS spectrum peak area with a S/N ≥5. Confident assignment was performed with only 1 possible candidate based on Zeno CID DDA MS/MS fragments (Figure 4).
The correlation workspace of Molecule Profiler software was used to confirm the presence of the significantly identified catabolites across several time points. The correlation workspace has an interactive graph window in which results can be displayed as an x-y plot, bar graph or table. In addition to the correlation workspace, overlaid XICs, TOF MS and TOF MS/MS spectra can be displayed for the chosen catabolites or metabolites. Figure 5 shows the correlation plot of leuprolide and 2 major catabolites discussed in this study.
The metabolism of peptide drugs is not solely dependent on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes found in the liver. As a result, using liver-derived models alone is insufficient to accurately predict the peptide therapeutic catabolites. Other tissues and blood can also contribute to the metabolic pathways of the peptide drugs. However, despite their inadequacy, hepatic models, blood/plasma and kidneys are frequently used and are irreplaceable systems to study peptide catabolism. Together, these models provide valuable insights into the initial steps of peptide degradation and elimination. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the ability to measure the disappearance of the substrate peptide and to identify catabolites in the liver model (liver s9 fraction). The results generated by combining Molecule Profiler software with the ZenoTOF 7600 system support the streamlined workflow to efficiently characterize and identify therapeutic peptide catabolites. 1