button-text
Haichuan Liu1, Ricardo Gomes2, 3, Zoe Zhang11SCIEX, USA; 2iBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Portugal; 3ITQB, Instituto de Tecnológia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
Download PDF
/content/dam/SCIEX/tech-notes/biopharma/ruo-mkt-02-14240-a/RUO-MKT-02-14240-B_MAM%20with%20EAD%207600_B.pdf
_self
Abstract
abstract
Introduction
introduction
Key features
key-features
Methods
methods
Overview
overview
Confident
Confident
Selection
Selection
Peak integration
integration
Conclusion
conclusion
References
references
abstract

Abstract

This technical note highlights the power of an EAD data-dependent acquisition (DDA) platform method1-4 for the identification of product quality attributes (PQAs) of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) and their quantification and monitoring using a single injection as part of a multi-attribute method (MAM). The streamlined MAM workflow that links the Biologics Explorer software to compliance-ready SCIEX OS software will also be demonstrated.

introduction

Introduction

MAM is a powerful LC-MS method for simultaneously monitoring and quantifying multiple PQAs or critical quality attributes (CQAs) of a biotherapeutic. Traditionally, CID-based MS/MS is employed as the first step for identification, followed by quantification with either only MS or MS and MS/MS workflows. However, full sequence confirmation, including the differentiation of leucine vs. isoleucineand aspartic vs. isoaspartic acid (Asp vs .  isoAsp) for deamidated peptides and the localization of fragile modifications, such as glycosylation, are not possible with CID-based MS/MS methodologies. Hence, the CID-based identification workflow must rely on complementary MS/MS techniques that use more advanced instrumentation in separate experiments before quantification of selected species can be performed. This challenge can be addressed using the EAD platform method5,6, which enables confident and accurate identification, quantification and monitoring of PQAs with MAM in a single injection (Figure 1).

key-features

Key features of an EAD-based MAM workflow

  • Confident PQA identification and differentiation of isomers: The single-injection EAD platform method allows differentiation of isomers and PTMs that are challenging for traditional characterization and MAM methods
  • Streamlined data flow: A customizable PQA list connects peptide mapping results in the Biologics Explorer software with PQA quantification and monitoring in a compliance-ready environment in SCIEX OS software
  • Powerful software for peptide mapping: The Biologics Explorer software offers powerful algorithms and optimized workflows for peptide mapping and PQA selection
  • Compliance-ready: PQA quantification and monitoring are performed in compliance-ready SCIEX OS software
Figure 1. An EAD-based MAM workflow.  The EAD platform method1-4 offered by the ZenoTOF 7600 system provides confident peptide mapping results for sequence confirmation and identification of post-translational modifications (PTMs) and enables differentiation of isomers. This is a prerequisite for achieving accurate quantification results of these PQAs and CQAs for MAM. The combination of the intuitive Biologics Explorer software for peptide mapping and compliance-ready SCIEX OS software for PQA and CQA quantification makes the EAD-based MAM workflow a streamlined, single injection process.
#C0C0C0
image-top
methods

Methods

Sample preparation:  The stock solution (10 µg/µL) of NISTmAb (reference material #8671, NIST) was aliquoted into 5 vials. One aliquot (control) was kept frozen and thawed prior to trypsin digestion. The remaining 4 aliquots of NISTmAb were heated at 60ºC for 1 day, 2 days, 7 days or 10 days, respectively. Trypsin digestion of the control and heat-stressed samples was performed following denaturation by guanidine-hydrochloride, reduction with dithiothreitol and alkylation using iodoacetamide. Each sample was analyzed in technical triplicates.

Chromatography:  Peptides were separated using an ACQUITY CSH C18 column (2.1 x 150 mm, 1.7 µm, 130 Å, Waters), which was kept at 60ºC in the column oven of an ExionLC system (SCIEX). Table 1 shows the LC gradient used for peptide separation at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min with mobile phases A and B consisting of 1% formic acid in water and 0.1% FA in acetonitrile, respectively.

#C0C0C0
image-top
Mass Spectrometry:  LC-MS data were acquired with an EAD platform method2-4 in SCIEX OS software using the ZenoTOF 7600 system. The key TOF MS and EAD parameters are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
#C0C0C0
image-top
#C0C0C0
image-top
Data Processing: Peptide mapping and PQA selection were performed using the “PeptideMapping_Simple” template in the Biologics Explorer software. The PQA list was imported into the Analytics module of the compliance-ready SCIEX OS software for relative quantification and monitoring of PQAs.
overview

Overview of MAM workflow

The MAM workflow described in this technical note takes advantage of the power of the EAD DDA platform method for confident peptide identification and differentiation of isomers, the robust ability of the Biologics Explorer software for peptide mapping and PQA selection and the trusted capability of SCIEX OS software for peak integration, quantification and reporting in a compliance-ready environment. The data flow for this MAM workflow is illustrated in Figure 2. The EAD DDA-based data acquired with the ZenoTOF 7600 system are processed using an optimized peptide mapping workflow template in the Biologics Explorer software. The PQAs confidently identified from peptide mapping are selected and exported to a PQA list (.TXT file), which serves as a connection between the Biologics Explorer software and SCIEX OS software. The PQA list can be directly imported into a processing method within SCIEX OS software. The peaks are then automatically integrated using the well-established MQ4 algorithm. These peak areas are used in the formula function within SCIEX OS software for the calculation of the percent abundances of PQAs. A metric plot can automatically be generated to visualize changes of the percent modification for studies of forced degradation or stability, for example. Finally, a custom report of the results can be generated and exported in different file formats, such as .doc or .pdf.

The isomerization and deamidation peaks of the peptide VVSVLTVLHQDWLNGK (abbreviated as “VVSV peptide”) from the heavy chain of the NISTmAb, HC [305-320], was examined as an example to demonstrate the power of EAD for the differentiation between Asp and isoAsp isomers and the streamlined MAM workflow for the relative quantification of these species.

Figure 2. Streamlined MAM workflow from the Biologics Explorer software to compliance-ready SCIEX OS software.  In this MAM workflow, the PQAs of a mAb were confidently identified from peptide mapping of EAD DDA data using the Biologics Explorer software. The PQAs of interest are reviewed, selected and exported to a .TXT file, which is then imported into a processing method created using the Analytics module of SCIEX OS software. Peak integration is performed using the MQ4 algorithm, followed by the creation of a custom formula for relative PQA quantification and monitoring. The reporting function offers many options for customization and selection of different file formats, such as .doc and .pdf.
#C0C0C0
image-top
Confident

Confident identification of PQAs using EAD

The EAD platform method is a powerful tool for confident identification and in-depth characterization of a wide range of peptides in a single injection, due to its unique capability for the preservation of labile modifications and differentiation of isomers without the need for optimization.2-6 Figure 3 highlights the chromatographic separation and identification of the isomerization and deamidation species of the VVSV peptide. While the identification of the isomerization peaks and the localization of deamidation at the Asn residue are straightforward even with CID-based methodologies, the differentiation of the 3 deamidated peaks eluting after the native species poses a challenge for standard MS/MS approaches. The detection of a signature isoAsp fragment (z3–57) derived from EAD enabled the confident assignment of these 3 deamidated peaks (Figure 3B), 2 of which were present as the isoAsp and 1 as the Asp form. The presence of these 2 isoAsp species can be attributed to aspartic acid racemization, as studied previously8,9, resulting in partial conversion of the  L-form (L-isoAsp) to its racemic D- counterpart (D-isoAsp). These results demonstrate the importance of using EAD for accurate identification of PQAs.

Figure 3. Differentiation between Asp and isoAsp isomers using EAD.  The native, isomerization and deamidation species of the VVSV peptide were chromatographically separated (A) and confidently identified by MS/MS using EAD (B). The detection of signature fragments5,7 (z3–57 and  z3–44) (B) allowed differentiation between the Asp and isoAsp isomers, leading to unambiguous assignment of the 3 peaks eluting after the native species. The 2 isoAsp peaks may be attributed to aspartic acid racemization7,8 and can be assigned as the  L- and  D- forms, respectively.
#C0C0C0
image-top
Selection

Selection and export of PQAs

The Biologics Explorer software offers intuitive control and powerful visualization for reviewing results and selecting PQAs. As illustrated in Figure 4, the isomerization and deamidation peaks of the VVSV peptide were selected in the peptide table, with their XICs displayed in the peptide chromatogram tab above the table. The PQAs selected were exported into a .TXT file using the “Export to Sciex OS” node in the Biologics Explorer software. Subsequently, this file was imported for creating the quantification method.

Figure 4. PQA selection in the Biologics Explorer software.  The PQAs are selected in the peptide table, while their XICs can be viewed in the peptide chromatogram tab above the table.
#C0C0C0
image-top
integration

Peak integration, relative quantification and monitoring of PQAs

In the MAM workflow, the creation of the processing method, peak integration and relative quantification of PQAs were all performed using the Analytics module within SCIEX OS software (Figure 2).

The Analytics module offers the powerful and well-established MQ4 algorithm for reproducible peak integration with minimal optimization. A comprehensive set of adjustable parameters is accessible to advanced users who may want to fine-tune the integration for certain applications. In this study, each isomer of the deamidated VVSV peptide was properly integrated with the defined quantification method (Figure 5), leading to accurate quantification of these species.

Figure 5. Peak integration in SCIEX OS software.  The Asp isomer of VVSV peptide at RT = 26.12 min was accurately integrated using the MQ4 algorithm.
#C0C0C0
image-top
The Analytics module provides full flexibility to build custom formulas in the processing method to calculate the percent abundances of PQAs.10-11 Figure 6 displays the quantification results of the PQAs of the VVSV peptide, obtained by applying the processing method with a custom formula to 3 replicate injections of the NISTmAb control and heat-stressed samples. The calculated percent abundances were highly reproducible within replicates for both CID and EAD methods, allowing for quantitative rigor (%CV <10%, see Table 4).
Figure 6. Results table of relative quantification of PQAs in the Analytics module of SCIEX OS software.  The table lists the peak areas and percent abundances of the isomerization and deamidation peaks of the VVSV peptide across 3 replicate injections of the NISTmAb control and heat-stressed samples.
#C0C0C0
image-top
#C0C0C0
image-top
These percent values increased notably for the Asp and different isoAsp forms, as the duration of heat stress applied increased from 0 to 10 days. To quickly examine results, SCIEX OS software offers metric plots for visualization (Figure 7A). Alternatively, the results can be exported and processed in Excel using other plot options (Figure 7B).
Figure 7. Visualization of the MAM results. The metric plot (A) and bar chart (B) both showcase the reproducibility of PQA quantification for replicate injections and the ability of the MAM workflow to monitor the percent abundances of PQAs for a time-course study.
#C0C0C0
image-top
conclusion

Conclusion

  • Confident identification of PQAs and unambiguous differentiation of their isomers are critical for the successful implementation of a MAM
  • Differentiation between Asp and isoAsp isomers from peptide deamidation, an essential class of PQAs that may affect a drug’s efficacy and safety, was achieved with a DDA platform method using EAD
  • Efficient identification was enabled in the Biologics Explorer software through ready-to-use workflow templates that provided confident peptide mapping results and visualization tools with the ability to export a PQA list to SCIEX OS software for quantification
  • The compliance-ready SCIEX OS software offered robust algorithms and tools for peak integration and relative quantification of PQAs
  • An effective MAM workflow from identification to quantification was achieved by data flow between the Biologics Explorer software and compliance-ready SCIEX OS software
references

References

  1. Takashi Baba, Pavel Ryumin, Eva Duchoslav  et al.  (2021) Dissociation of biomolecules by an intense low-energy electron beam in a high sensitivity time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.   32(8):1964-1975.
  2. Comprehensive peptide mapping of biopharmaceuticals utilizing electron activated dissociation (EAD). SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-12639-B.
  3. A new electron activated dissociation (EAD) approach for comprehensive glycopeptide analysis of therapeutic proteins. SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-12980-A.
  4. An evaluation of single injection platform method for advanced characterization of protein therapeutics using electron activation dissociation (EAD). SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-13965-A.
  5. Differentiation of aspartic and isoaspartic acid using electron activated dissociation (EAD). SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-12550-B.
  6. Differentiation of leucine and isoleucine using electron activated dissociation (EAD). SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-12605-B.
  7. Nadezda Sargaeva  et al.  (2009) Identification of aspartic and isoaspartic acid residues in amyloid β peptides, including Aβ 1-42, using electron-ion-reactions. Anal. Chem.   81(23): 9778-9786.
  8. Marine Morvan and Ivan Miksik. (2021) Recent Advances in Chiral Analysis of Proteins and Peptides. Separations   8(8): 112.
  9. Seongmin Ha,  et al.  (2017) Identification of ᴅ-amino acid-containing peptides in human serum. PLoS ONE   12(12): e0189972.
  10. Compliant attribute monitoring for biopharmaceutical product quality attributes employing intact mass analysis. SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-11314-A.
  11. A liability study on oxidation using SCIEX OS software 1.7 for intact MAM. SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-11551-A.