Shuai Wu1, Jeffrey J. Jackson1, Iain D.G. Campuzano1, Rahul Baghla2 and Eshani Galermo2
1Amgen, USA; 2SCIEX, USA
Small molecule therapeutics have been a fundamental component of the pharmaceutical industry for several decades. Their lower molecular weight and cell-membrane permeability allow for oral administration and enable them to effectively reach intracellular targets. The therapeutic efficacy of these drugs is closely tied to their molecular structure, which plays a crucial role in their interaction with biological targets and the subsequent desired therapeutic effects.
The analytical techniques such as LC-MS/MS are essential to effectively analyze the structures of small molecule therapeutics. This technical note demonstrates a comprehensive approach for structural analysis of small molecule therapeutics using collision-induced dissociation (CID) and alternative fragmentation, electron-activated dissociation (EAD), on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. Here, structural analysis of sotorasib and other benzimidazolone compounds is demonstrated (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Comprehensive structural analysis of small molecules on the ZenoTOF 7600 system using Molecule Profiler software. The structure of sotorasib, a representative small molecule compound, was analyzed using MS/MS spectra from Zeno CID MRMHR and Zeno EAD MRMHR. Both fragmentation techniques provided several unique fragments for a more detailed analysis of sotorasib structure. Unique fragments were labeled using Zeno CID MRMHR (green) and Zeno EAD MRMHR (red) experiments.
Electron-based fragmentation methods, such as ECD and ETD, have traditionally been more suitable for generating c and z type fragment ions from multiply charged ions, providing complementary structural information to CID. However, these techniques are not optimal for producing unique fragment ions from singly charged small molecules.
Recently, a new electron-based fragmentation method called EAD has been introduced on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. This technique enables adjustment of the electron kinetic energy for the fragmentation based on the types of structures being analyzed. For small molecules, EAD can function as electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO) to generate unique fragment ions from singly charged small molecules, enabling more thorough structural analysis.1-3
This technical note demonstrates a comprehensive structural analysis workflow for small molecule therapeutics with Zeno EAD MRMHR and Zeno CID MRMHR experiments on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. Here, structural analysis of sotorasib4 and benzimidazolone5 compounds 1 and 2 was evaluated.
The standards for sotorasib and benzimidazolone compounds were acquired from Amgen.
Chromatography: Samples were analyzed using an ExionLC system at a 0.5 mL/min flow rate on a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 column (2.1 x 50 mm, 2.6 µm, 100 Å). The column temperature was maintained at 40°C. A 6-minute gradient was run using 0.1% formic acid in water as mobile phase A and 0.1% formic acid in methanol as mobile phase B (Table 1). An injection volume of 5 μL was used for analysis.
Table 1: Chromatographic gradient for sotorasib.
Mass spectrometry: The optimized Zeno EAD AND Zeno CID MRMHR parameters are listed in Table 2 and the source and gas parameters are included in Table 3.
Table 2: Zeno DDA parameters.
Table 3: Source and gas parameters.
Data processing: SCIEX OS software, version 3.3.0, was used for data acquisition. Molecule Profiler software was used to characterize the structures using Zeno EAD MRMHR and Zeno CID MRMHR experiments.
The Zeno trap in the ZenoTOF 7600 system significantly boosts the sensitivity of MS/MS fragments. Therefore, Zeno MRMHR data enables superior MS/MS spectrum quality for target peaks of interest in both CID and EAD acquisitions. For data processing, Molecule Profiler software enables seamless structural analysis using information from Zeno CID MRMHR and Zeno EAD MRMHR experiments.
Sotorasib and 2 benzimidazolone compounds were used as an experimental model to demonstrate structural analysis using Molecule Profiler software. For sotorasib, 30 fragments were identified using Zeno CID MRMHR and 46 fragments were identified using Zeno EAD MRMHR (Figure 2). The Molecule Profiler software compiled the m/z, ion formula and error (ppm) for each fragment identified.
Figure 2: Features on Molecule Profiler software for structural analysis of sotorasib. The panel shows an interpretation pane with an inverted overlay of the EAD TOF MS/MS (blue) and CID TOF MS/MS (green) spectra. All unique fragments were marked in pink. The panel also indicates the composition and structure of the analyte as well as fragment information including charge state, mass error and intensity.
Compared to Zeno CID, more unique fragments were identified using Zeno EAD data, and extensive fragments within heterocyclic rings were observed using EAD for sotorasib (Figure 3). Unique EAD fragments at m/z 462.1731, 478.1694 and 365.1216 were related to the fragmentation of heterocyclic rings. More specifically, m/z 462.1731 corresponded to the fragmentation of the piperazine ring and m/z 478.1694 represented the fragmentation of the pyridine ring. Overall, fragment identification was performed with <5 ppm mass error.
Figure 3: Fragment ion spectra for sotorasib using Zeno CID MRMHR and Zeno EAD MRMHR. Zeno CID MRMHR generated 6 unique fragments compared to Zeno EAD MRMHR, where 24 unique fragments were generated. EAD produced more structurally informative fragments within the heterocyclic rings, such as piperazine and pyridine. The top panel shows the EAD spectrum (blue) and the bottom panel shows the CID spectrum (green). Unique fragments are shown in pink.
In addition to unique fragments, common fragments were also identified between Zeno CID MRMHR and Zeno EAD MRMHR experiments. In Figure 4, the structure of sotorasib shows several common fragments that were identified with <5 ppm mass error. In summary, both Zeno CID and Zeno EAD experiments can fragment C-N, C-F and some C-C bonds between or outside of the heterocyclic rings.
Figure 4: Common fragments identified using Zeno CID DDA and Zeno EAD DDA. Both CID and EAD can fragment C-N, C-F and some C-C bonds between or outside of major heterocyclic rings. The mass error for all fragments identified was <5 ppm.
Additionally, 2 benzimidazolone compounds were evaluated using Zeno EAD MRMHR and Zeno CID MRMHR. Data from example benzimidazolone compounds 1 and 2 are displayed in Figure 5A and Figure 5B, respectively. For benzimidazolone compound 1, unique EAD fragments at m/z 175.0119, 330.0732 and 416.1822 corresponded to the fragmentation of the heterocyclic rings. More specifically, m/z 416.1822 corresponded to the fragmentation of the benzimidazolone ring. For the benzimidazolone compound 2, unique fragments at m/z 216.0322 (EAD), 395.0347 (CID) and 421.0508 (EAD) were produced from benzimidazolone ring fragmentation. All fragments were identified with <5 ppm mass error.
Figure 5: Comparing Zeno CID MRMHR and Zeno EAD MRMHR spectra of example benzimidazolone compounds 1 and 2. In general, the EAD spectra showed more unique fragments compared to CID for benzimidazolone compounds 1 (A) and 2 (B). For each compound, the top panel shows the EAD spectrum (blue) and the bottom panel shows the CID spectrum (green). Unique fragments are shown in pink.