Increasing sensitivity for quantification of insulin analogs using the SCIEX 7500 system, powered by SCIEX OS software
Xiang Liu1, Ji Luo1, Lihai Guo1 and Ebru Selen2
1SCIEX, China; 2SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates a highly sensitive quantification workflow for insulin analogs on a high-end triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Intact insulin lispro in rat plasma was used as a model to demonstrate the quantitative performance of the SCIEX 7500 system. A lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 50 pg/mL was achieved using a simple sample preparation method paired with an 8-minute LC-MS/MS analysis.
Short-acting insulin analogs, such as insulin lispro, aspart and glulisine, are more readily absorbed and exhibit faster biological actions compared to human insulin.1 As a result of their key role in insulin therapeutics, it is important to study the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin analogs. While LC-MS based methods remain the most sensitive and selective platforms for the analysis of insulin therapeutics, analytical challenges prevail. Insulin analogs are often difficult to ionize and fragment, given their high molecular weight and their structural complexity, conferred by disulfide bridging (Figure 1). In addition, insulin analogs are difficult to quantify at low concentrations in biological matrices, given interference from endogenous insulin.
Here, a simple sample preparation paired with a LC-MS/MS method was developed for the sensitive quantification of intact insulin lispro in rat plasma. Enhanced sensitivity for quantification was achieved with front-end improvements on the SCIEX 7500 system for better ion generation, capture and transmission.
Key features of the insulin lispro MRM workflow on the SCIEX 7500 system
Sample preparation: Insulin lispro standard (50 to 50000 pg/mL) and 10 μL of the internal standard, proinsulin (2000 pg/mL), were spiked into 200 μL of rat plasma. The mixture was precipitated by adding 200 μL of 1:1, methanol/acetonitrile with 1% acetic acid, then centrifuging the mixture at 13,000 rpm for 10 mins. A 400 μL aliquot of the supernatant was mixed with 900 μL of 5% aqueous ammonia. The sample was subjected to solid phase extraction using a Phenomenex StrataX-A microelution 96-well plate following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Chromatography: Separation was performed on an Exion LC system, using a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (3 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm) column. Mobile phase A was 0.2% acetic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.2% acetic acid in acetonitrile. The operating flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The column temperature was set to 50°C. The gradient conditions used are summarized in Table 1. A 20 μL aliquot of the sample was injected for LC-MS/MS analysis.
Mass spectrometry: Analysis was performed using a SCIEX 7500 system with the OptiFlow Pro ion source operated in positive MRM mode. The source conditions and MRM transitions used are summarized in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
Data processing: The MRM data were processed using the Analytics module in the SCIEX OS software, version 2.0 using the MQ4 integration algorithm. A weighting of 1/x2 was used for quantification.
Low abundance, high molecular weight and interference from endogenous components pose significant challenges to the reliable quantification of insulin therapeutics. The SCIEX 7500 system offers enhanced sensitivity for the quantification of insulin analogs in complex matrices with improved front-end features that increase ion generation, capture and transmission.2
Quantification of intact insulin lispro in rat plasma was performed using the positive MRM mode on the SCIEX 7500 system (Figure 2). The limit of detection (LOD) was 25 pg/mL and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50 pg/mL (Figure 2A). Strong linearity was achieved using a 6-point calibration curve that ranged from 50 to 50000 pg/mL with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.99430 (Figure 2B). The linear dynamic range (LDR) covered 3 orders of magnitude. Figure 2C summarizes the quantitative performance, highlighting the excellent %CV (<12%) and accuracy (95-105%) across the range of 50 to 50000 pg/mL.
Quality control (QC) samples were also analyzed at the low, medium and high concentrations of 100 pg/mL, 500 pg/mL and 20000 pg/mL, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the %CV (<10%) and accuracy (88-100%) for low, medium and high concentrations, demonstrating the excellent assay reproducibility and accuracy.