Using the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 3500 LC-MS/MS System with an ExionLC™ AD System
Zhang Chong1, Liu Bingjie1, Li Lijun1, and Guo Lihai1
1SCIEX, Shanghai
A complete workflow combining the use of the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 3500 System with a fast sample preparation procedure for the sensitive detection of 8 organic explosives is described. The method is shown to provide a simple solution for high-throughput detection of trace explosives in soil samples.
The widespread use of explosive materials by the military, blasting, mining and other industries has fueled the continuous development of explosive production technology. The fast and simple process of manufacturing explosive devices has also enabled terrorists to clandestinally construct and use explosives to pursue their criminal endeavors. As a result, the presence of explosives in geographical warzones or in crime scenes has important political and legal implications.
Although their detection provides valuable legal evidence of their use as weapons, the daily occurrence of explosive materials is a rising concern for health and legal authorities alike. In addition to their destructive nature, the majority of organic explosive materials are carcinogenic to the human body. Inevitably, their production and use have serious impact on environmental pollution and contamination and can pose serious health issues to the population exposed to it. As a result, rapid and accurate screening techniques are critically needed to detect trace levels of explosives with a high level of sensitivity and selectivity.
Mass spectrometry is a sensitive analytical technique with the throughput and selectivity required for rapid and confident security screening. Because explosive compounds are intrinsically rich in electron-withdrawing nitrogen-containing groups and thermally instable in nature, they are suitable for analysis by LC-MS/MS technology.
In this technical note, a comprehensive workflow combining the use of the SCIEX Triple Quad 3500 System with a simple and fast sample preparation procedure for the sensitive detection of 8 organic explosives is described. The method is shown to provide a simple solution for high-throughput detection of trace explosives in soil samples.
Sample preparation: 10 g of surface soil samples were dissolved in 10 mL of methanol:acetonitrile (50:50, v/v), spiked at various concentration levels with a standard mixture containing the 8 organic explosives, vigorously vortexed for 30 seconds, sonicated for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. 2 µL of the supernatant was injected for analysis. Table 1 lists the 8 organic explosives used in this study. The sample preparation procedure is summarized in Figure 2.
Liquid chromatography: LC separation was performed using a Phenomenex Kinetex biphenyl column (50 × 3 mm, 2.6µm, 00A-4723-AN) held at 40 °C on a SCIEX ExionLC™ AD System. Mobile phases used were ammonium formate, ammonium chloride, and methanol. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The injection volume was 2 µL and the total LC runtime was 8 min.
Mass spectrometry: A SCIEX Triple Quad 3500 LC-MS/MS System with Turbo V™ Source and Electrospray Ionization (ESI) was used. The 8 organic explosives were detected in negative ion mode using two MRM tansitions per compound to allow quantification and confirmation of the explosive compounds.
Data analysis: Data was acquired in Analyst® Software 1.7 and processed in MultiQuant™ Software 3.0.3.
10 g of surface soil samples were dissolved in 10 mL of methanol:acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) and spiked with the 8 organic explosives at various concentrations. The resulting samples were vortexed vigorously, sonicated for 5 minutes, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes and 2 µL of the supernantant was injected to the instrument to build a data processing method.
Figure 1 shows the extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) for the 8 organic explosives. The combination of an appropriate mobile phase composition, column choice and optimized LC conditions resulted in baseline separation of all 8 organic explosives.
The quantitative performance of the assay was investigated by injecting a series of soil samples spiked with the explosive compounds at various concentration levels ranging from 0.05 to 1000 ng/g. Calibration curves were generated to evaluate the sensitivity and linearity of the assay as well as the linear dynamic range of the instrument for each of the 8 explosive compounds.
Figure 3 shows the calibration curves for both the quantifier and qualifier ions of the 8 explosive compounds for concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1000 ng/g. The calibrarion curves show excellent linearity, with R2 values >0.99 for all the explosive compounds. Sensitivity down to sub ng/g was achieved and the linear dynamic range exceeded 4 orders of magnitude for the majority of the explosive compounds without internal standard correction. This demonstrates that the SCIEX Triple Quad 3500 System provides sensitive and accurate quantification of explosive compounds across a wide range of concentration levels. Table 2 summarizes the quantitative results for the assay and includes the concentration range and the R2 values for the 8 explosive compounds analyzed in this study.
One of the challenges associated with the detection of analytes extracted from soil samples is the presence of many matrix components that can affect the detection performance of the assay. As a result, a reliable sample preparation procedure is critical to achieve the desired reproducibility and analytical performance of the assay.
To assess the efficiency of the sample preparation procedure used in this experiment, the recovery was calculated by spiking a soil sample with the standard mixture at two concentration levels (5 and 10 ng/mL) before and after the sample pre-treatment procedures. Three replicate injections were performed for each of the two concentrations. The recovery values (depicted as “RE”) were calculated for each of the 8 organic explosive compounds at both concentration levels by dividing the average peak area of the pre-spiked sample (depicted as “A”) by the average average peak area of the post-spiked sample (depicted as “B”) as shown in the following equation:
RE (%) = A/B x 100 (1)
The sample preparation procedure used in this experiment demonstrated recovery values ranging between 51.7 and 106%, as shown in Figure 4. In addition, the assay showed excellent reproducibility across the three injections for the two concentration levels with RSD values between 1.31 and 4.59% (Figure 5) for all the explosive compounds used in this study. The result shown in Figure 4 and 5 illustrate the overall robustness and reproducibility of the assay.
A complete workflow for the detection of 8 organic explosives in soil samples was successfully developed using the SCIEX Triple Quad 3500 System. The combination of a simple sample preparation procedure and a robust LC-MS method enabled accurate detection of the organic explosives in soil samples.