PTM site localization and isomer differentiation of phosphorylated peptides 

Tunable electron activated dissociation (EAD) MS/MS using the SCIEX ZenoTOF 7600 system

Joanna Bons1, Jason Cason2, Birgit Schilling1, Christie Hunter3
1
Buck Institute, USA, 2SCIEX, Canada, 3SCIEX, USA

Abstract

Specific location of phosphorylation sites on proteins is important in fully understanding their role in cellular processes. However, depending on the peptide sequence, this can be challenging. Here, the use and benefits of tunable electron activated dissociation (EAD) for phosphopeptide analysis and confident site-localization was evaluated on the ZenoTOF 7600 system. The combination of Zeno MS/MS with EAD provided high quality MS/MS for full characterization of the peptide including clear differentiation of the two phosphopeptides isomers studied. Fragmentation patterns for the two phosphopeptide isomers were compared between EAD and collision induced dissociation (CID), direct evidence for the location of the phosphorylation on the two peptides was only observed using EAD. Skyline software was used for processing the MRMHR data, both the CID and EAD data.

RUO-MKT-02-13174-A_f0

Introduction

Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification (PTM) as it is involved in a large variety of dynamic cellular processes. However, PTM site localization and quantification of phosphopeptides by collision induced dissociation (CID) MS/MS can be challenging, and phospho-peptides can exhibit a partial neutral loss of the phospho group (‑98 Th). Phospho-isomer differentiation and subsequent precise PTM site localization can be achieved by measuring isomer-specific ions containing the actual modification (direct evidence), or by measuring differentiating fragment ions that do not contain the modification (indirect evidence). Depending on the peptide sequence, detecting near complete fragment ion series, and more particularly the challenging fragment ions that would define the peptide C- and N- termini, can be necessary for PTM-site localization, such as for pS-56 and pS-59 of the NDUFA10 subunit of mitochondrial Complex I1 (Figure 1). The benefits of electron activated dissociation (EAD) versus CID were first explored for malonylation PTM.2

In this study, the use and benefits of EAD fragmentation for phosphopeptide analysis, site-localization and differentiation, and MS/MS-based phosphopeptide quantification were evaluated.

Figure 1. MS/MS spectra of LITVDGNICSGKpSK peptide analyzed with CID and EAD fragmentation. The phosphorylated peptide at m/z 505.58 (z=3) was analyzed in (A) CID mode and (B) EAD mode (kinetic energy, KE = 2). CID fragmentation resulted in low abundant and noisy PTM-specific differentiating ions (y and prominent y-98, no detected b ions). However, comprehensive EAD MS/MS generated distinct z and c fragment ions that provided evidence for definitive PTM site localization.

Key features of EAD for phosphoproteomics

  • Efficient electron activated dissociation (EAD)3 generates strong and distinct PTM site localization ions, enabling phospho-isomer differentiation
  • Tunable kinetic energy (KE) for EAD MS/MS allows for selection of KE that provides the highest fragment ion abundance, while not inducing neutral loss from the phosphoryl group (-98 Th)
  • Generation of strong PTM-containing site localization ions, even small z+1 ions (z2+1, z3+1 and z4+1) and high c ions (c10, c11 and c12)4
  • The optimal KE values are different between different types of modifications, phosphorylation and malonylation2
  • Using the Zeno trap gives up to ~10x increase in intensity for key site-localizing fragment ions (small z+1 ions and high c ions)
  • Preliminary quantification using EAD high-resolution MRM (MRMHR)5 indicates good linearity over concentrations interrogated
  • Detailed characterization and MS/MS-based quantification of the modified peptides analyzed by EAD MS/MS using Skyline.

 

Methods

Sample preparation: Phosphorylated synthetic peptides were obtained from Princeton Biomolecules Corporation and diluted in simple matrix for analysis.

Chromatography: A NanoLC 425 system plumbed for microflow chromatography (5 µL/min) was used and operated in direct injection mode. The analytical column used was a 0.3 mm x 150 mm (2.6 µm particle size) Phenomenex Omega Polar column. Column temperature was controlled at 30°C. Short gradients of 8 minutes were used.

Mass spectrometry: All data was acquired using a SCIEX ZenoTOF 7600 system and an OptiFlow Turbo V ion source6 equipped with the microflow probe and 25 µm electrodes. The system is equipped with the electron activated dissociation (EAD) cell which enabled hot electron capture dissociation (hot ECD) to be performed in a targeted manner on the phosphorylated peptides. MRMHR data were collected using a TOF MS scan of 250 msec and MS/MS accumulation times of 150 msec both in CID and EAD fragmentation modes. Electron current was also ramped to optimize and a final value of 5000 nA was used throughout study. Kinetic energies were ramped and optimized per analyte.

Data processing: MRMHR data were processed using SCIEX OS software 2.1 using both Explorer and Analytics modules, and Skyline (version 3.6).7

Figure 2. Sequence of the investigated phosphorylated isomeric peptides. Peptides at position 47-60 in bovine NDUFA10 subunit of Complex I (P34942) and carrying phospho-groups on serine S-56 (top) and S-59 (bottom) were investigated. PTM site-specific ions are highlighted in blue.

EAD fragmentation enables direct PTM site localization

Two isomeric phosphorylated peptides from bovine mitochondrial NDUFA10 subunit of Complex I (P34942), LITVDGNICpSGKSK and LITVDGNICSGKpSK, were synthetized with a phospho-serine at position S-56 and S-59 respectively (Figure 2) (hereafter referred to as LITV-pS-56 and LITV-pS-59 respectively).

In order to effectively characterize PTM peptides, it is important to detect the ‘intact’ fragment ion(s) containing the modification to confidently determine its type and localization site. Here, the modification sites of the two isomers are two amino acids apart, close to the peptide c-terminus, respectively at positions pS-56 and pS-59 on the 14 aa-long peptides making these modifications difficult to characterize. Therefore, near complete coverage of the ion series in both directions is required to localize the PTM site. 

However, in CID small y-ions and large b-ions are often challenging to detect, and in addition CID MS/MS induces some neutral loss of H3PO4 (-98 m/z) from the labile phosphorylation group (Figure 1 and 4B-D). Fortunately, MRMHR analysis using EAD MS/MS enabled detection of PTM-containing, site-specific ions, such as c10 to c12 for LITV-pS-56 and z2+1 to z4+1 for LITV-pS-59, in blue (Figure 3) with very good intensity, providing direct evidence for the phosphorylation site on each peptide (Figure 4A-C). Additional differentiating, non-PTM containing ions were also observed, such as z2+1 to z4+1 for LITV-pS-56 and c10 to c12 for LITV-pS-59, in black (Figure 3). Altogether, these results allow confident discrimination of both isomers. 

MRMHR assays using EAD MS/MS uniquely provided quantification of phosphopeptides using PTM-site specific ions (Figure 4A and C) which have very strong signal. Whereas, when using CID MS/MS, the required differentiating ions are very low abundance (Figure 4B and D) which negatively impacts quantification sensitivity in addition to not providing definitive discrimination between the two peptide isomers. 

Figure 3. EAD fragmentation enables isomer differentiation. MS/MS spectra of (A) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (B) LITVDGNICSGKpSK at m/z 505.58 (z=3) analyzed in EAD mode (KE = 2). PTM-containing site-specific ions are indicated in blue, additional differentiating ions in black.

Figure 4. EAD fragmentation enables preserving the labile phospho-group. Differentiating ions of phosphorylated isomers (A, B) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (C, D) LITVDGNICSGKpSK analyzed in (A, C) EAD (KE = 2) and (B, D) CID modes were extracted in Skyline. In EAD mode, the labile phospho-group is preserved.

Targeted EAD MRMHR for detailed characterization

MRMHR is a MS/MS-based targeted acquisition strategy for accurate quantification that offers the possibility to process and refine data post-acquisition using dedicated tools such as Skyline. First, near complete c- and z+1-ion series were extracted for the two isomeric peptides in Skyline as shown in Figure 5A and B. When extracting all possible fragment ions (PTM-site specific as well as ions that are in common between the two phospho-site isomers) two chromatographic peaks are detected that correspond to the two isomers that were obtained. However, when only PTM site specific fragment ions are extracted for the corresponding peptide isomers in each case, for pS-56 (Figure 5C) and for pS-59 in (Figure 5D), it is possible to unambiguously differentiate these isoforms with the pS-56 isomer eluting at 6.45 min and the pS-59 isomer eluting at 6.6 min.

Targeted EAD MRMHR data processing in Skyline offers a detailed characterization of the modified peptides of interest. Currently, Skyline computes c- and z+1-ions that can be visualized and used for precise MS/MS quantification.

Figure 5. The extraction of site-specific fragment ions in Skyline from EAD data enables PTM localization sites. (A, B) Near complete c- and z+1-ion series were obtained with the EAD dissociation for the phosphorylated isomers (A) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (B) LITVDGNICSGKpSK. Post-acquisition data refinement in Skyline enables differentiating the two isomeric peptides (C) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (D) LITVDGNICSGKpSK using only discriminating ions.

Tunable kinetic energy for EAD MS/MS preserves labile phospho-groups 

The kinetic energy during EAD MS/MS can be tuned on the ZenoTOF 7600 system so that the fragmentation parameters can be customized to favor both the preservation of the labile phospho-group and to generate optimal sensitivity. In this experiment, kinetic energies (KE) were ramped from 0 to 11. For the two phosphopeptide isomers, the optimal KE value was 2, which generated high intensity differentiating and site-specific fragment ions that contained the intact PTM, while generating very limited background noise (Figure 6). Increased KE values, above 7, resulted in some neutral loss for the differentiating ions for LITV-pS-56. To note, the KE-dependent abundance patterns vary slightly for the illustrated, site specific ions between the isomeric peptides. The neutral loss of -98 Th is only observed on the c-ions when using the very high KE values. Thus, the tunable KE allows for the generation of methods that will both preserve the site-specific fragment ions (KE 2) and induce neutral loss (KE 11) for complete characterization of a modified peptide.  

Figure 6. Kinetic energy ramping for EAD MS/MS. Phosphorylated isomeric peptides (A) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (B) LITVDGNICSGKpSK were analyzed in EAD mode with KE values ranging from 0 to 11. Chromatographic peaks were extracted for 12 fragment ions. For the intact ions (first row), peak area values were normalized to the highest area. For the neutral loss ions (second row), peak area values were normalized to their respective intact ion.

Preliminary linear response for quantification

To get an initial appreciation of the quantitative performances of MRMHR assays using EAD MS/MS, 4-point concentration curves were designed (4, 20, 100 and 500 pg on-column), and each point was injected in triplicate (Figure 7). Six differentiating ions were investigated for each peptide, and each showed good linear response (R2 ≥ 0.93). Although the explored dynamic range is limited (2.1 orders of magnitude), this first assessment suggests utility of EAD MS/MS for quantification.

Figure 7. Linear response of fragment ions during EAD MRMHR.  Peptides (A) LITVDGNICpSGKSK and (B) LITVDGNICSGKpSK were analyzed in EAD mode (KE = 2) in triplicate and at various loading amounts (4, 20, 100 and 500 pg). Six fragment ions are displayed. The R2 coefficient for determination of the linear regression is displayed for each ion.

Zeno trap improves sensitivity

Finally, to explore the impact of the Zeno trap on quality of EAD MS/MS spectra and sensitivity performances, EAD MS/MS analyses were performed with and without the Zeno trap activated. Analysis with Zeno trap on significantly increases sensitivity and thus generates higher intensity c and z+1 ions (Figure 8), strengthening the confidence for PTM site localization and isomer differentiation. Differentiating fragment ion peaks were extracted, and the ratios of the areas obtained with Zeno trap on and off were determined (Table 1). Sensitivity gains ranging between 7.4 and 14.9 were achieved for the various fragment ions. All the ions benefited from the activation of the Zeno trap, and more particularly the smaller ones, as the average gain was 12.7 for the three investigated small z+1 ions and 9.0 for the high c ions. 

Figure 8. Increased sensitivity using the Zeno trap. MS/MS spectra of LITVDGNICSGKpSK peptide (m/z 505.58, z=3) analyzed in EAD mode (KE = 2) (A) without and (B) with the Zeno trap activated. Significant improvements in signal intensity and thus spectral quality was observed while using Zeno MS/MS in combination with EAD, enabling more confident PTM site localization. 

Table 1. Gain of MS/MS sensitivity using the Zeno trap.  LITVDGNICpSGKSK and LITVDGNICSGKpSK peptides were analyzed in EAD mode (KE = 2) with and without the Zeno trap activated, loading various amounts (4 and 20 pg on column). Chromatographic peak areas were extracted and sensitivity changes between Zeno trap on and Zeno trap off were determined.

Conclusions

In this work, the performance of electron activated dissociation (EAD) on the SCIEX ZenoTOF 7600 system was investigated for the characterization and the quantification of phosphorylated isomeric peptides.

  • Specifically tuning the kinetic energy (KE) for the phosphorylated peptide isomers is an added value for determination of PTM site localization, for differentiating isomers, and for improving quantification accuracy
  • For the two phosphorylated isomers investigated, an optimal kinetic energy value of 2eV allowed preservation of the labile group and generated fragment ions with site localization evidence
  • Activation of the Zeno trap provided large improvements in sensitivity, leading to highly confident PTM characterization
  • Using MRMHR and collecting full scan EAD MS/MS fragmentation offers the possibility to refine the extracted chromatographic peaks post-acquisition, using dedicated processing tools such as Skyline
  • Preliminary quantitative assessment of EAD MRMHR workflows shows promising performances for the robust and accurate quantification of labile PTMs 

 

References

  1. Schilling B, Aggeler R et al. (2005) Mass spectrometric identification of a novel phosphorylation site in subunit NDUFA10 of bovine mitochondrial complex I. FEBS Lett, 579(11):2485-90.
  2. Tunable electron assisted dissociation (EAD) MS/MS to preserve particularly labile post-translational modifications. SCIEX technical note RUO-MKT-02-13006-A.
  3. Qualitative flexibility combined with quantitative power - Using the ZenoTOF 7600 system, powered by SCIEX OS software. SCIEX technical note RUO-MKT-02-13053-A.
  4. Peptide fragmentation using electron activated dissociation (EAD). SCIEX community post RUO-MKT-18-13296-A.
  5. Schilling B, Hunter CL et al. (2015) Multiplexed, scheduled, high-resolution parallel reaction monitoring on a full scan QqTOF instrument with integrated data-dependent and targeted mass spectrometric workflows. Anal Chem, 87(20): 10222-9.
  6. Single source solution for low flow chromatography. SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-9701-A.
  7. MacLean B, Tomazela DM et al. (2010) Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics, 26(7):966-8.