The Power of Precision
ZenoTOF 7600 system
SCIEX 7500 system
SCIEX Triple Quad 6500+ system
SCIEX 5500+ system
QTRAP 6500+ system
QTRAP 4500 system
View all mass
Intabio ZT system
Echo MS system
2.0 High Throughput Multiplexing system
View all integrated
BioPhase 8800 system
8000 Plus system
800 Plus system
Advance your research with front-end
instruments designed to help you realize the full power of your mass
spectrometer. SCIEX has the broadest portfolio of ESI-MS front-ends
can facilitate various flow rates, sample requirements and
sensitivities. No one else offers the entire range
flow, microflow, nanoflow LC-MS and even ultra-low flow
ExionLC 2.0 series
View all front-end HPLC MS
Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) and
ion mobility spectrometry are analytical techniques used to separate
ions based on their gas phase mobility. Multiple types of ion
devices exist, such as drift tubes, traveling wave, and high-field
asymmetric waveform devices. Learn how you can separate yourself
Differential Ion Mobility.
The latest ion sources from SCIEX enable
enhanced sensitivity and robustness with greater desolvation range
across all MS platforms, from Triple Quad to QTRAP and QTOF.
Turbo V ion
OptiFlow Turbo V ion
View all ion sources
vMethod applications are pre-configured and verified LC-MS/MS
that reduce the need for method development – significantly cutting
time, effort and money to deploy a new assay. Every vMethod provides
method conditions, recommended sample prep, LC and MS conditions,
details for applicable MS/MS library databases for key applications.
and personal care products (PPCPs)
and protein bioanalysis
Explore vMethod applications
feature request portal
Biologics Explorer software
Molecule Profiler software
High resolution and QTRAP
libraries can dramatically enhance the quality of your analysis,
you much improved confidence in your data. With a comprehensive
at your fingertips, you can easily create methods and process
and non-targeted screening data on your complex samples, faster and
easier than ever before.
All in one
HR-MS/MS library with NIST 2017
Explore the library
Boost the performance of your mass
spectrometer and improve sensitivity, productivity, and data
iChemistry Solutions are the world's only reagents and
that are custom designed with your success in mind.
RNA 9000 Purity & Integrity kit
kit for amino acid analysis of hydrolysates
kit for amino acid analysis of physiological fluids
Protein CE-SDS Purity Analysis kit
MS calibration kits
CZE rapid charge variant analysis kit
BioPhase Fast Glycan Labeling and Analysis kit
View all consumables
QTOF – Quadrupole
Time of Flight
QTRAP® – Triple Quad Linear
SWATH® – Data Independent
SelexION® – Differential
MicroLC – Microflow
View All Technology
ADME and DMPK
Viral vector characterization
High-throughput mass spectrometry
Targeted protein degraders and PROTACs
Extractables and leachables
Residual nucleic acid analysis
Lipid nanoparticles and non-viral carrier
Messenger RNA analysis
Plasmid and DNA analysis
Synthetic oligonucleotide analysis
Cell line analysis
Charge heterogeneity analysis
Intact protein analysis
Peptide mapping analysis
Subunit mass analysis and middle-down
View all Biopharma and pharma
Clinical Mass Spec Operators
Clinical Method Developers
Clinical Lab Managers
View All Clinical
Pesticides & herbicides
Soil and biota
View All Environmental
How do you protect your reputation and meet today’s global food
standards? Whether you are a commercial lab or a food manufacturer,
quality of your food testing data is vital to your business. SCIEX
solutions help you meet maximum residue limits (MRLs) with
data that you can genuinely count upon. With a portfolio of
applications, your lab can quickly and easily react to diverse
Authenticity & Profiling Analysis
& Food Contact Substance Analysis
Food and Beverage Testing
How do you ensure the integrity of your
results in an industry that is never constant? By accurately
even the smallest compound angles you can deliver evidence that
SCIEX forensic analysis solutions deliver fast, highly accurate
data across a multitude of compounds and biomarkers, from the known
the new and novel.
Homeland security (coming soon!)
Cannabis and hemp potency testing
View All Forensic
Metabolic Flux Analysis
and SNP Analysis
View All Life
The SCIEX Now Learning Hub offers the most diverse and flexible learning options available, with best-inclass content that helps you to get the most out of your instrument and take your lab to the next level. Available personalized learning paths based on the latest memory science ensure better knowledge retention, and automated onboarding and enrollment means you’ll get up and running faster.
SCIEX Now Learning Hub offers the most diverse and
flexible learning options available, with best-in-class content that
helps you to get the most out of your instrument and take your lab
the next level. Available personalized learning paths based on the
latest memory science ensure better knowledge retention, and
onboarding and enrollment means you’ll get up and running faster.
SCIEX Learning Manager provides you with the infrastructure to assign, monitor and report on your staff's
competency through a single digital platform. Effectively manage the training process for new hires, ensure
continuous staff development and access information with a single log-in to your SCIEX account.
You can browse, filter, or search our
extensive list of training offerings. Choose from over 100
eLearnings or search for an instructor-led course near you. Once you
select the course you want to take, you will be directed to
Learning Hub for enrollment (login required).
Login to SCIEX Now Learning Hub
Success Programs at Your
Scientist Training at Your Site
Visit all Training
SCIEX Now Learning Hub
Manage my instruments
SCIEX Now New Feature Request
Visit your SCIEX
Declaration of conformance
Safety data sheets
Certificates of analysis
View All regulatory documents
Software and IT services
LC-MS service plans
Protect Plus Suite for your new LC-MS
CE service plans
Clinical service plans
StatusScope remote monitoring
Software accelerator program
Software support plans
Software support policy
Premium access content
Academic partnership program
View all partnership programs
Join the SCIEX community today to
interact with your peers, share and exchange ideas, develop
your knowledge, stay up-to-date with the latest products,
post insights and questions, comment on others and receive
support. This community is designed to help you, our
customers, move science forward and get the answers you
need. We’re committed to engaging with and listening to you,
to create the best customer experience possible and to
contribute to the success of your work.
Environmental / Industrial
Food and Beverage
Life Science Research
Now Feature Requests
View All Community
Echo® MS Center Of Excellence
Our favorite papers
Meet our executives
In the news
You've got questions. We've got experts who
can help. Contact us to find out more, talk to a specialist, explore
solutions or get expert support.
Request a quote
SCIEX success network
Request hosted catalog
Global public relations
Bosnia and Herzegovina
United Arab Emirates
United Republic of Tanzania
AB Sciex is doing business as SCIEX. © 2010-2018 AB Sciex. The trademarks mentioned herein are the property
of the AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. or their respective owners. AB SCIEX™ is being used under license. Beckman
Coulter® is being used under license. Product(s) may not be available in all countries. For
information on availability, please contact your local representative. For
research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Download tech note (PDF)
Reproducible EPA Method 537 results with increased sensitivity on SCIEX Triple Quad™ 6500+ System
Karl A. Oetjen, Diana Tran, Simon C. Roberts, Craig Butt and Christopher Borton
Combining microflow chromatography with SCIEX Triple Quad 6500+ System provides ultimate sensitivity for PFAS compounds in drinking water and soils. This application note describes the configuration and provide data on robustness and sensitivity. Sensitivity gains over high flow chromatography were demonstrated.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are manmade compounds containing carbon-fluorine monomers.1 Per- and polyfluorinated compounds are chemical compounds that have all the hydrogens on the carbons replaced by fluorine.1 The abundance and strength of the C-F bonds make natural degradation of these compounds in the environment extremely difficult, while also making them highly resistant to degradation from acids, bases, oxidants, and heat.1,2 The overwhelming presence of PFASs in drinking water systems and in humans has motivated the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to monitor fourteen PFAS compounds, including PFOA and PFOS, in drinking water in Method 537.3
The U.S. EPA advisory level of PFOA and PFOS combined is 70 ng/L in drinking water, however, some studies have suggested this level might be 100-fold too high.4 This new research has influenced some states, like Vermont, to impose or suggest lower acceptable limits. In 2016, Vermont adopted an advisory level of 20 ng/L for PFOA and PFOS combined, with other states like Minnesota, New Jersey, and Michigan following suit with their own levels. As water system operators take appropriate steps, and the suggested PFAS concentration limits continue to decrease, more sensitive and robust analytical methods are needed.
This application note presents a microflow method for the analysis of EPA Method 537 on the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 6500+ LC-MS/MS System coupled with an OptiFlow® Turbo V Ion Source and a M5 MicroLC System. Due to the fact that EPA Method 537 requires samples be prepared in 96:4% (vol/vol) methanol/water, this study also utilizes an online mixing strategy using an analytical conduit adapter (AnaCondA). This approach prevented peak shape distortion and splitting in microflow chromatography due to lower flow rates and smaller column diameters.
Figure 1. Microflow LC setup with analytical conduit adapter (AnaCondA) for sample mixing in sample flow path.
Sample preparation: Sample preparation and data processing were carried out according to EPA Method 537. An additional 1/10 dilution was then performed. A total of 20 samples were extracted out of a variety of matrices, including drinking water, groundwater, wastewater, and soil extracts. The internal standards (ISTD) used were 13C2-PFOA, 13C4-PFOS, and d3-NMeFOSAA. The surrogates used were 13C2-PFHxA, d5-NEtFOSAA, and 13C2-PFDA. The complete sample set, including calibration and quality control samples, was run on 3 separate days.
Chromatography: The microflow analysis was performed using an M5 MicroLC System at a flowrate of 10 µL/min. A Gemini C18 3 µm, 100 x 0.3 mm column (Phenomenex) was used. This column uses the identical stationary phase, but smaller internal diameter as the high flow method.5 Mobile phases A and B were Milli-Q water with 10 mM ammonium acetate and J.T.Baker Ultra LC-MS grade methanol with 10 mM ammonium acetate, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1. MFLC gradient for microflow EPA Method 537 analysis.
A novel online AnaCondA mixer was placed upstream of the analytical column to promote mixing (Figure 1). This approach works through increasing the Reynolds number (Equation 1) and promoting turbulence, therefore creating more mixing.
Typically, the high injection solvent strength required by EPA Method 537 causes excessive breakthrough and peak splitting, even with a 1 µL injection volume (Figure 2a). To prevent this from occurring, online mixing was promoted using an AnaCondA with a wide internal diameter (ID) of 0.5 mm and length of 5 cm after the sample loop as shown in Figure 1. In addition to the AnaCondA, a faster sample injection speed was performed to increase the mixing turbulence. This allowed the injection volume to range between 1 – 10 µL without breakthrough or peak splitting (Figure 2b). The data shown in this application note was generated using a 4 µL injection volume, to represent a traditionally monitored concentration range.
Equation 1. Reynolds Number equation.
Figure 2. Advantage of using the online analytical conduit adapter mixer for microflow PFAS analysis. (Top) Example chromatograms of PFBS and PFHxA using direct injection without mixing with microflow chromatography. (Bottom) Same microflow chromatography with online mixing using the AnaCondA.
Mass spectrometry: The sample was injected into the SCIEX Triple Quad 6500+ System equipped with a OptiFlow Turbo V Ion Source that was designed specifically for lower flow rates. The optimized source conditions can be found in Table 2.
All analytes were monitored in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scan mode in negative polarity. The Scheduled MRM™ Algorithm was used to monitor compounds during a 60 second expected retention time window to maximize dwell times and optimize the cycle time of the method.
Data processing: Results were processed in SCIEX OS Software 1.7. Peak asymmetry and ion ratios were automatically calculated using custom columns. All calibration curves had a 1/x concentration weighting and were forced through the intercept as specified in EPA Method 537.
Table 2. OptiFlow Turbo V Ion Source settings for microflow EPA Method 537 analysis.
In EPA Method 537, peak asymmetry must fall in the range of 0.8 to 1.5 for the first two eluting compounds (PFBS and PFHxA). Using the outlined method, PFBS and PFHxA met all asymmetry requirements with values ranging from 1.0 to 1.2 (Table 3) at all the quality control concentration levels. Additionally, the ion ratios for both PFBS and PFHxA were within ±20% and the calculated concentration was within 5% of the expected value.
Table 3. Asymmetry and quality control parameters at different continuing calibration check concentration levels for PFBS and PFHxA.
Microflow LC has been widely used in the pharma and biopharma applications but has infrequent use in environmental applications. To ensure ruggedness of both the method and analysis, calibration curves were generated, then drinking water and soil samples were acquired in triplicate over 3 separate days. To evaluate whether suppression is occurring throughout calibration curve process, the ISTDs areas were plotted over the 3 day run for all calibration and quality control samples (Figure 3, top). The mean ISTD area was calculated and all collected data points fell within ±20%, suggesting no major suppression was occurring. The surrogate concentrations were also plotted over the 3 day run and found to be within the acceptable ±30% outlined in EPA Method 537 (Figure 3, bottom).
The normalized area of the ISTDs was compared for all extracted samples (Figure 4). The median normalized area for 13C2-PFOA was 98%, with the lowest response at 71% and the highest at 125%. All values were within ±30%, suggesting no major ion suppression or enhancement is occurring. The median normalized surrogate area for 13C2-PFDA was 101%, with the lowest value of 82% and the highest of 120%, thus indicating acceptable recovery during extraction the recovery of this compound during the extraction process is acceptable.
Figure 3. Reproducibility of data. 13C2-PFOA (used as an internal standard, top) and 13C2-PFDA (used as a surrogate, bottom) in the analysis were plotted for all standards, QC’s and blanks.
Figure 4. Normalized areas of A. the internal standard 13C2-PFOA and B. the surrogate 13C2-PFDA in all processed samples.
The 9 or 10-point calibration curve exhibited good accuracy within +/- 30% of the expected values for all points, accuracy within +/- 50% for the lowest calibrator, and R2 coefficients of >0.990 (Table 4). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) varied between 1 and 5 parts per trillion (ppt) in vial, equating to 0.04 and 0.2 ppt in the sample before extraction (Table 4; Figure 5). If further sensitivity was needed, a larger injection volume (up to 2.5x larger) could be performed.
The sensitivity between the presented microflow LC method and traditional flow method 5 using a 4 µL injection was compared. This comparison was made by dividing the signal to noise (S/N) for the compound using the microflow LC method by the S/N of the compound using the traditional flow method. This ratio was measured at the lowest point of the calibration curve in the traditional flow data. The lowest point of the traditional flow data was used because the microflow LLOQ was significantly lower. Comparing sensitivity gains from the current microflow method to high flow, all PFAS compounds showed improved sensitivity from the smaller flow rates. The exact change in peak signal intensity varied across the panel largely due to individual analyte properties (data not shown). However, the sensitivity gains ranged from 2.2 for PFOS to 24.2 for PFTeDA.
Table 4. The LOQ in of EPA 537 PFAS components in vial and in the extracted sample.
Figure 5. Example LLOQ chromatograms. PFBS (left column) and PFUdA (right column) showing a laboratory reagent blank (LRB), 1 ppt and 5 ppt standards.
Various PFAS compounds were detected in the 20 analyzed samples. The compound most frequently present in the samples above the LLOQ was PFBS, which was found in 16 of the 20 samples (Figure 6). The concentrations of PFBS ranged from 0.5 to 44.8 ppt in the samples before extraction. PFOS was the second most detected compound, present in 8 of 20 samples, with concentrations ranging from 1.9 ppt to above the ULOQ (>100 ppt in the sample.
Figure 6. PFBS chromatograms in extracted samples. The concentrations of PFBS ranged from 0.5 to 44.8 ppt in the samples before extraction.
A sensitive and robust method was developed for microflow analysis of the analytes in EPA Method 537. The assay showed reproducibility of internal standards, surrogates, and calculated concentrations of unknown environmental samples over multiple days. The increase in sensitivity in this study enabled LLOQs of 1-5 ppt for EPA Method 537 with a 4 µL injection volume. A larger injection volume, enabled by the AnaCondA mixing approach, would allow for even lower LLOQs if necessary.
The Destination for All Your Support Needs