Yang Zong1, Rui Gong2, Cheng Haiyan1, Li Lijun1, Guoli Hai1
1SCIEX, China; 2Wuhan Institute for Food and Cosmetic Control, China
LC-MS on SCIEX X500R QTOF System was used to establish a global profiling workflow for determining the authenticity and geographical origin of some plants important to edible oil production. Vegetable oil quality analysis such as this could provide an important tool for assessing fraudulent or adulterated products in the global food supply.
Plant-derived cooking oil is an important source of nutrition for human consumers; this source of fatty acids plays an important role in the body as one of the three primary macronutrients1,2,3. Fatty acids such as those from edible vegetable oils provide constituents for human cells and tissues as well as a variety of important physiologically active substances and functions. Triacylglycerols (TAGs) are the main components of plant oils more than 95%4. The physicochemical and nutritional properties of plant oils are determined by TAG molecule structure (Figure 1). The nutritional value of vegetable oils varies with the different fatty acids of TAG structure. Therefore, for studying the authenticity and traceability of vegetable oils, identification of TAGs structure and fat acids composition can provide more accurate, direct, and reliable evidence.
There are many challenges in identifying the authenticity and geographical origin of edible vegetable oils, and in developing robust methods for lipids analysis or even nontargeted screening analysis. Selecting appropriate representative samples to study is key. The complexity of the lipids in samples is high, especially considering the glycerides in oil, with many isomers and their higher molecular weight. Chromatography of lipid samples is not straightforward, especially if required to match previously published studies of lipids. Finally data analysis typically requires high expertise.
In this study, high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry on the SCIEX X500R QTOF System was used to perform global profiling to establish a workflow for determining the authenticity and geographical origin of some plants important to edible oil production. Vegetable oil quality analysis such as this could provide an important tool for assessing fraudulent or adulterated products in the global food supply.
Pretreatment: A quick and simple sample preparation was employed, using methanol / isopropanol (1 / 1,5mM ammonium acetate) and directly diluting the sample for analysis.
Chromatography conditions: The SCIEX ExionLC™ AC System was employed for analytical separation using a Phenomenex C18 column (2.6 μm, 2.1 × 100mm). The mobile phases were as follows: Buffer A - Water / methanol / acetonitrile (3/1/1, with ammonium acetate at 5mM), Buffer B: Isopropanol (containing 5mM ammonium acetate). The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min with a column temperature of 60 °C. The injection volume was 2 μL.
MS conditions: The X500R System (SCIEX) was operated using an IDA method, with a TOF MS survey scan and multiple MS/MS spectra acquired per cycle. Method details are in Table 1.
Data processing: First, target lipid lists for TAGs, DAGs, and FFA were prepared in LipidView Software 1.2 using the LV Method Exporter tool. These lists of compounds and masses were imported into SCIEX OS-Q Software for extraction of the TOF MS peak areas for each of the species. Confirmation of identities using MS/MS was performed manually in combination with the Catalogue and Calculator in LipidView Software. Then, areas for the identified lipids were exported for analysis in MarkerView™ Software 1.3.1 for statistical analysis to find differences between sample types.
The experiment consisted of a total of 290 samples (145 injections in positive ion mode, 145 injections in negative ion mode). Aliquots of each sample were mixed to prepare a QC sample. In the injection process, each QC sample injection was separated by 6 samples. While the samples were injected, it was also included in the design that six QC check samples were collected, spaced evenly throughout the injection sequence every 24 samples. Three different ions with different retention times were selected for evaluation for repeatability and stability. The sampling period of different molecular weights present in the ion difference reproducibility difference. Shown in Figure 3, although the instrument sample collection spanned almost eight days without interruption, the three different m/z values with differing retention times were demonstrated to be reproducible throughout the run. The instrument is thus shown to be able to cope with complex matrix introduction, as well as excellent stability, ensuring the reliability of all the sequence data.
Oil is a complex sample matrix and co-elution of many constituents in the sample means the mass spectrometer must have very high acquisition rates to achieve the collection of all relevant spectral information for species identification and quantification.
The X500R System can acquire MS and MS/MS spectra at very high acquisition rates (up to 100 Hz), allowing for high resolution spectra to be acquired on large numbers of lipids in one injection. With the LC strategy used here, the LC peaks have a chromatographic width of only 0.2 min, but high acquisition rates ensured that 15 points were collected each peak, strongly benefiting the accuracy and reproducibility of integrations during quantification (Figure 4). After 12 hours of continuous operation with back to back injections, instrument maintains a 1 ppm mass accuracy, well within the required tolerance (Figure 5).
Because free fatty acids do not have unique MS/MS fragments, qualitative analysis of free fatty acids was evaluated by the rules of retention times. Figure 8 showed that the retention interval was 0.2 min for FFA 18:0, FFA 18:1, FFA 18:2, FFA 18:3. In addition, the fewer carbon double bonds of FFA had stronger chromatographic retention than the greater carbon double bonds of FFA.
Data processing for authenticity of the oils was done using a multi-step process. Lipid profiling was performed by using a list of masses determined in LipidView Software then imported into SCIEX OS-Q Software for targeted extraction. The profiling results, primarily from vegetable oil, showed the main components as TAG, DAG, and FFA. There were 283 triglycerides and diglycerides and 27 FFAs identified. The peak areas of the identified components are then imported into to MarkerView™ Software for statistical data processing (PCA, T-test). Omics approaches use MarkerView data processing software as it is a simple and intuitive way to quickly find the differences between the seven kinds of oil.
Good grouping of replicates of oil types was observed using the TAG data, showing clear oil type differentiation (Figure 9, top). Using the FFAs, good clustering of sample replicates was also observed with the exception of corn and sunflower oils which were not significantly separated in the Scores plot (Figure 9, middle).
T-test results indicated significant differences between sample sets for 39 kinds of glyceride compounds and nine kinds of free fatty acids (Figure 9, bottom). These potential markers were applied to authenticity identification and geographical origin characterization of seven vegetable oils.
After identifying the distinguishing compounds in the edible oils, the peak areas were used to further assess of the differences in concentration levels of the marker compounds in the seven kinds of vegetable oil (Figure 10). Peanut oil and rapeseed oil have many obvious differences compared with other five kinds vegetable oil, mainly in TAG 56:3, TAG 56:4, TAG 56:5, TAG 58:3, TAG 58:4, TAG 58:5, TAG 60:3, TAG 60:4, TAG 60:5; indicating that these glycerides may be used as the basis for identification of these two types of oil.
Some olive oil producers will add a cheaper oil to more expensive oil products to extend product and increase profits. To further verify this experimental approach and find markers which can be applied to identify the authenticity of edible oil in a routine quantitative analysis, evaluation experiments were performed using blind sample testing. Vegetable cooking oil from a blind sample brand manufacturer was shown to be mainly comprised of different proportions of sunflower oil and olive oil, according to experiment results. The ratio of the sum of the peak area of the markers in olive oil and sunflower seed oil to the peak area of the markers in blend oil was close to 1 (Figure 11), indicating that the blend oil can be identified by using the found TAG markers. And results suggest this approach could be used to test oil authenticity.
Olive oil and soybean oil were collected from different countries and regions. Olive oil is the main oil produced by Italy, Greece, Spain; soybean oil is the main oil produced in China, Brazil, and the United States. The geographical origin analysis experiments found a total of 34 distinguishing markers.
Due to geographical and climatic differences, components of leading olive oils from three different countries can have differences in glycerides and free fatty acids content. In Figure 12, according to the results of PCA analysis using the FFAs, there is clear differentiation between the olive oils from the different countries (Italy, Greece, Spain). And the groupings of oils from within each country were quite tight.
For soybean oil, grouping using the FFAs for the oils from China, Brazil, and the United States did not product clear differentiation, however the triglycerides groups are obvious (Figure 13).
These results suggest that profiling of the TAGs and FFAs in oil will enable differentiation of oils by type and country.