Data independent acquisition on TripleTOF® 6600 Systems
Joerg Dojahn1, Nick Morrice2, Christie Hunter3
1SCIEX, Germany, 2SCIEX, UK, 3SCIEX, USA
The SWATH® Acquisition data independent acquisition strategy provides a comprehensive quantitative analysis of complex samples, providing full scan high resolution MS and MS/MS on all detectable compounds eluting off the column. These datasets can then be re-interrogated over and over again as new information on new compounds of interest emerges. Specificity can be optimized by balancing the Q1 window width, the number of Q1 windows and accumulation time per window, such that analyte S/N can be improved significantly while maintaining good quality quantitative results. Optimization to scale the window size with precursor density, based on the matrix being analyzed, can further improve results.
Previous work has demonstrated that the depth of coverage of SWATH Acquisition can be extended through acquisition optimizations, aimed at improving the signal/noise ratio of the quantitative data. The extended dynamic range of the TripleTOF 6600 System has enabled improved quantification across the broad concentration range of analytes found in biological samples. Fast MS/MS acquisition speeds have been leveraged to enable the use of 100 Q1 isolation windows, decreasing the complexity of data within each MS/MS window and thereby improving the specificity. Combined with variable window acquisition, very narrow windows can be used in precursor dense portions of the peptide m/z range, while still maintaining broad m/z coverage.1
A less explored variable on depth of coverage is the impact of the size of the ion library. Previous studies have suggested that more quantitative data is available in a SWATH Acquisition data files than is accessed from a small ion library generated from 1D data dependent acquisition experiments (Figure 1). Here, the impact of using larger and deeper ion libraries on the numbers of peptides and proteins detected was explored and the quality of quantitation observed by processing the same data file with increasingly deeper ion libraries was assessed.
2D LC-MS/MS fractionation: A digest of a K562 human cell lysate (Promega) was fractionated using high pH reverse phase chromatography using a Shimadzu Nexera system (UV detection at 214nm). A Durashell RP column (250 x 4.6mm, 5um, Agela Technologies) operating at 1 mL/min was used, running a gradient of 2 – 90% acetonitrile in 2mM ammonium hydroxide. 15 fractions were collected every 2 mins.
Each subsequent peptide fraction was then separated using low pH reverse phase gradient on the NanoLC™ 425 system operating in microflow mode. A Triart C18 150 x 0.3mm column (YMC) was used at 5 µL/min flow rate with a 45 min gradient from 2-40% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The eluent was analyzed using the TripleTOF 6600 System equipped with a DuoSpray™ Source and a 25 µm ID electrode. Data dependent acquisition was performed with 30 MS/MS per cycle, each with 50 msec accumulation.
1D LC-MS/MS chromatography: Separation of a trypsin digest of HEK human cell lysate or yeast cell lysate was performed on a NanoLC™ 425 System. A 75 µm x 30 cm C18 nanocolumn was used with a long gradient (5-30% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid in water) at 300 nL/min. Gradient lengths for human analyses were 60 mins for 1D library generation and 180 mins for SWATH Acquisition. For yeast, the gradient length for both 1D library generation and for SWATH Acquisition was 120 mins.
Mass spectrometry: The MS analysis was performed on a TripleTOF 6600 System (SCIEX) using a NanoSpray® Source (SCIEX). Information dependent acquisition was acquired on the fractionated and unfractionated lysates, using the 30 MS/MS per cycle with 50 msec accumulation time. Variable window SWATH Acquisition method was built using Analyst® TF Software 1.7 using 100 variable windows and 25msec accumulation times.
Data processing: 1D and 2D libraries were created by processing the IDA data using ProteinPilot™ Software. SWATH Acquisition data was processed using SWATH 2.0 Micro App in PeakView® Software 2.2 using the various ion libraries excluding modified and shared peptides. Results analysis was performed in Excel using the SWATH Acquisition Replicates template. All protein and peptide numbers reported were determined at <1%FDR and <20% CV across the 5 replicates collected.
An ion library for targeted data processing of data independent acquisition data contains information that characterizes the peptides for many proteins in a proteome. The masses of the peptide ion and its sequence specific fragment ions, the relative fragment intensity information, and the relative retention time information are the key information pieces and are easily obtained by performing a simple data dependent acquisition and database search. However, it is worth taking the extra time to create a deeper ion library for the biological system under study as much more information can be extracted from SWATH Acquisition data (Figure 1).
A 2D fractionation followed by LC-MS/MS protein identification on a specific complex sample can be performed in a matter of days using microflow LC which generates much deeper coverage of the proteome sample. This is well worth doing for a sample that will be studied repeatedly by SWATH Acquisition.
Some groups have invested significantly more time in library generating using multiple cell types and a large degree of fractionation to cover as much of the proteome as possible.2,3 These libraries have high value and are easily shared between research groups.
As shown in Figure 1, the detection of peptides from a yeast cell lysate can be greatly enhanced by using a much deeper ion library; in this case a library generated with a 1D protein identification (Table 2) was compared with using a pan yeast library4.
The SWATH Acquisition data files used here for a more detailed investigation was five replicates of a 3 hour nanoflow gradient run on a 3 µg load of a HEK human cell lysate on the TripleTOF 6600 System. Figure 2 summarizes the data processing experiments run on this dataset with 3 different libraries.
In total, a 332% gain in peptides and 118% gain in quantified proteins was observed between using a simple ion library and an extensive ion library (Figure 2). This highlights the significantly deeper information that is contained in the SWATH Acquisition data over traditional DDA data. The quality of quantitation is key aspect to consider when to assessing improvements in data processing strategies. Even as more data is extracted from the data files using the deeper libraries, the quality of quantitation is maintained even into the low abundant protein/peptide regime (Figure 3).
Depending on the depth of the ion library needed and the available time for analysis, a researcher can balance the library generation effort required for a particular biological system. The detection rates for each library were computed, comparing quantified peptides/proteins to those present in total library. As expected, the % detection decreases as the ion library size increases (Figure 4, top). However the library generation time also increased (Figure 4, bottom). Microflow LC was used during creation of the 2D library, which can help speed up the process of library building and of course the number of fractions and cell lines analyzed used can be varied. A researcher can balance all these considerations when deciding on the right ion library strategy for their biological system of study.
High quality SWATH Acquisition can be acquired using Variable Window acquisition and 100 Q1 windows on TripleTOF Systems. These data files contain a tremendous amount of quantitative data and to fully mine the potential information from this data, deep ion libraries are key for targeted data processing. Here, we demonstrate significant gains in peptides and proteins quantified (332% and 118% gains, respectively) when transitioning from a simple 1D ion library to a pan human library. For the data file investigated here, 5922 proteins were quantified at <20% CV when processed using the very comprehensive pan human library. Therefore, in addition to optimizing experimental conditions for SWATH Acquisition, choosing an appropriation ion library strategy that matches the depth of coverage required for the biology under study is also important.